Love Attitudes Scale – LAS (Online-33 items)
The above is a sample of the complete report version.
Purchase information:
1. This assessment is conducted entirely online.
2. Your order will be confirmed automatically upon payment, and you will immediately receive an email containing the link to the online assessment.
3. After accessing the link and answering all the questions, re-enter it to view the full report.
4. For logged-in users: Your order details will include the online assessment link. You will also receive an order confirmation email containing the assessment link to the registered email address you provided.
5. For non-logged-in users: Please ensure you record the link to the online assessment provided in the order details.
The Love Attitudes Scale (LAS) is a widely used psychological assessment tool designed to measure individual differences in attitudes toward love and romantic relationships. Developed by American psychologists Clyde and Susan Hendrick in 1986, the scale is rooted in Canadian sociologist John Alan Lee’s “colors of love” theory, which posits that love can be categorized into six distinct styles. The LAS has become a cornerstone in research on romantic relationships, providing a structured way to explore how people perceive, experience, and engage in love.
1. Theoretical Foundation: John Alan Lee’s Love Styles
The LAS is based on Lee’s (1973) typology of six basic love styles, which he described as “primary” (core, innate orientations) and “secondary” (combinations of primary styles):
- Primary Styles:
- Eros (Romantic Love): Characterized by intense passion, physical attraction, and idealization of the partner. Individuals high in Eros often experience “love at first sight” and prioritize emotional and physical intimacy.
- Ludus (Game-Playing Love): Views love as a game, emphasizing fun, variety, and avoidance of commitment. Those with a Ludus orientation may engage in multiple relationships simultaneously and resist long-term bonds.
- Storge (Friendship Love): Develops gradually from a foundation of trust, shared values, and companionship. Storgic love is marked by stability, mutual respect, and a focus on long-term compatibility.
- Secondary Styles:
- Mania (Possessive Love): Combines Eros and Ludus, resulting in intense dependency, jealousy, and emotional volatility. Individuals high in Mania may oscillate between extreme happiness (when the partner shows affection) and deep distress (during conflict).
- Pragma (Practical Love): Blends Ludus and Storge, prioritizing rational criteria (e.g., education, income, family background) in partner selection. Pragmatic lovers seek “compatibility” and view relationships as a partnership built on shared goals.
- Agape (Altruistic Love): Merges Eros and Storge, defined by selflessness, sacrifice, and unconditional care for the partner. Agapic individuals prioritize their partner’s needs above their own and derive fulfillment from giving.
2. Structure and Administration
The LAS consists of 33 items, Participants rate their agreement with each statement using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagreeto 5 = Strongly Agree). The scale is typically administered as a self-report questionnaire, with instructions to respond based on current or recent romantic relationships (or hypothetical scenarios if no prior experience exists).
3. Key Features and Interpretations
The LAS yields a score for each love style, with higher scores indicating a stronger alignment with that orientation. The primary goal is to identify an individual’s dominant love style(s)—the style(s) that best describe their typical approach to relationships. For example:
- A high Eros score suggests a preference for passionate, emotionally intense relationships.
- A high Ludus score indicates a tendency to avoid commitment and view love as recreational.
- A high Storge score reflects a focus on friendship and gradual relationship development.
Importantly, the LAS does not label any style as “better” or “worse”; rather, it provides insight into how individuals navigate love. Many people exhibit a combination of styles (e.g., Eros + Storge), and styles can evolve over time due to life experiences or relationship dynamics.
4. Psychometric Properties
The LAS has demonstrated strong reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (construct and criterion-related) across diverse populations:
- Internal Consistency: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the six subscales range from 0.71 to 0.89, indicating reliable measurement within each style.
- Test-Retest Reliability: Studies show moderate to high stability over time (e.g., 0.75 for Eros, 0.82 for Storge), suggesting that love styles are relatively consistent but not fixed.
- Construct Validity: Factor analyses consistently confirm the six-factor structure, aligning with Lee’s theoretical model. The scale also correlates predictably with other relationship constructs (e.g., commitment, satisfaction, loneliness).
5. Applications
The LAS is used in various contexts, including:
- Academic Research: To explore links between love styles and relationship outcomes (e.g., satisfaction, longevity), personality traits (e.g., neuroticism, extraversion), and demographic factors (e.g., gender, culture).
- Clinical Practice: To help therapists and counselors understand clients’ relationship patterns and address issues such as codependency (Mania), commitment phobia (Ludus), or unmet emotional needs (Eros).
- Personal Growth: As a self-assessment tool to help individuals reflect on their relationship preferences and improve communication with partners.
6. Cross-Cultural Adaptations
The LAS has been translated and validated in numerous countries, including Portugal, Serbia, and China, demonstrating its cross-cultural stability. For example:
- A 2024 study in Portugal found that the LAS-SF maintained its six-factor structure and showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.71–0.78) among 1,153 participants.
- A study in Serbia confirmed the scale’s factor structure and found correlations between love styles and relationship behaviors consistent with Western samples.
These adaptations highlight the LAS’s utility as a global tool for studying love and relationships.
7. Limitations
While the LAS is widely respected, it is not without limitations:
- Self-Report Bias: Like all self-report measures, the LAS is susceptible to social desirability bias (e.g., underreporting “game-playing” tendencies) or recall bias (e.g., misremembering past relationships).
- Context Dependence: Scores may vary depending on the relationship context (e.g., a person may exhibit different styles with a casual partner vs. a long-term spouse).
- Oversimplification: Reducing love to six styles may overlook the complexity of individual experiences. Some researchers argue that love is more fluid and multifaceted than the LAS captures.
8.Conclusion
The Love Attitudes Scale (LAS) remains a valuable tool for understanding the diverse ways people experience love. Its theoretical grounding in Lee’s work, combined with robust psychometric properties, has made it a staple in relationship research and practice. While it is not a definitive measure of love, the LAS provides a useful framework for exploring how attitudes shape romantic relationships—and for helping individuals build more fulfilling connections.
